Question and Submission History
Original questions and earlier responses, linked to the consolidated answer bank.
This history preserves the anonymized wording and earlier written responses in the imported project records. Earlier responses may describe a previous design or contain wording now under review. Use the linked consolidated question for the current response status.
A source record can contain several questions. These records are not a count of individual submissions or people. Original messages and dates are still being reconciled; this history does not establish that every project submission has been captured.
Showing 4 of 211 source records
Charlton Select Board Meeting · April 14, 2026Isn't Charlton already hosting twice as much solar energy as its residents consume? Why should the town host more state power?
Earlier published response
Battery storage (BESS) isn't about generating electricity, just like a water tower isn't about generating water. It is about getting more use out of the energy we already produce, leveraging it to meet peak demand and regulate the grid throughout the day. Because Charlton is uniquely and strategically positioned near a major East-West transmission line, it serves as a critical node for reinforcing grid reliability and efficiency as electric load rises.
How the issues were handled
A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.
- Why Charlton, and why this site?
Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Community Public Forum · September 30, 2026Why Charlton, and why this site?
Earlier published response
Charlton was not chosen so much as the Carpenter Hill Substation was. The 345 kV and 115 kV transmission lines meet there, and it connects eastern and western Massachusetts. We described it as an interchange on a highway, where voltage can be stepped up or down to serve the region. Battery storage fits best at a substation like this one. When we find a suitable substation, we reach out to the surrounding landowners to see whether any are willing to lease land to host a project.
How the issues were handled
A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.
- Why Charlton, and why this site?
Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · July 15, 2026, 6:56 AM ETWhy Charlton. We have lost a lot of land to Amazon, construction and solar projects to mention a few. We can't afford to lose space to a project that would further damage the environment. Why Charlton
Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)
Charlton was not chosen so much as the Carpenter Hill Substation was. The 345 kV and 115 kV transmission lines meet there, and it connects eastern and western Massachusetts. Because the project connects at an existing substation, it needs only a short line to the substation and no new long-distance transmission.
Each project is considered on its own merits, and cumulative burden is taken into account. The burden is high for this census block. A cumulative impact analysis is part of the state process and will become part of the public record. If the project is built, tree clearing outside the existing New England Power (National Grid) transmission right-of-way is committed at no more than 10 acres, on a 47-acre parcel.
How the issues were handled
A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.
- Will it change the rural character, views, and quiet?
Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed. - Why Charlton, and why this site?
Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed. - Charlton already has solar, a power plant, gas storage. Why add this?
Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · August 4, 2026Beyond the convenience and financial value of being close to the existing substation, why is Charlton the appropriate host community?
Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)
Energy storage has to connect where the grid already exists, and two transmission voltages converge at the Carpenter Hill Substation, which makes it a workable connection point. Whether the site is appropriate beyond that depends on factors such as a parcel large enough for real setbacks, clearing limited to a fraction of the land, and distance from neighbors. A preliminary draft of the Site Suitability Analysis, which evaluates these factors, is available now. Read it online at https://carpenterhillpower.com/reports/site-suitability or download the PDF at https://carpenterhillpower.com/files/carpenter-hill-site-suitability-analysis-draft.pdf. The final assessment required by the state process will be part of the public filing record.
How the issues were handled
A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.
- Why Charlton, and why this site?
Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
