Question and Submission History

Original questions and earlier responses, linked to the consolidated answer bank.

Back to questions and answers

This history preserves the anonymized wording and earlier written responses in the imported project records. Earlier responses may describe a previous design or contain wording now under review. Use the linked consolidated question for the current response status.

A source record can contain several questions. These records are not a count of individual submissions or people. Original messages and dates are still being reconciled; this history does not establish that every project submission has been captured.

Showing 2 of 211 source records

Charlton Select Board Meeting · April 14, 2026Can adjacent BESS projects bypass starting reviews from scratch under EFSB rules?

Earlier published response

Under state EFSB regulations, co-located or adjacent projects may share grid infrastructure, but they are not exempted from review. Any separate project, regardless of ownership, must undergo its own independent public permitting review and meet all safety, environmental, and site-specific criteria.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Could the project grow?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Community Public Forum · September 30, 2026Could the project grow?

Earlier published response

The current proposal is 150 megawatts. A larger project, or a second one, would need its own state review with public comment and hearings.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Could the project grow?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.