Question and Submission History

Original questions and earlier responses, linked to the consolidated answer bank.

Back to questions and answers

This history preserves the anonymized wording and earlier written responses in the imported project records. Earlier responses may describe a previous design or contain wording now under review. Use the linked consolidated question for the current response status.

A source record can contain several questions. These records are not a count of individual submissions or people. Original messages and dates are still being reconciled; this history does not establish that every project submission has been captured.

Showing 6 of 211 source records

Public Community Meeting #1 · July 8, 2026As an outsider moving in as a business, what is your standard for how you operate? We expect you to treat the area as sensitive to its established norms.

Earlier published response

We completely agree, and we want you to hold us to that standard. Since we do not live in Charlton, we rely on local residents to tell us what matters. We aim to protect the local environment and act as a good neighbor throughout this process.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Will our feedback change anything?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Will it change the rural character, views, and quiet?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Who makes sure the promises are kept?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · July 15, 2026, 6:56 AM ETWhy Charlton. We have lost a lot of land to Amazon, construction and solar projects to mention a few. We can't afford to lose space to a project that would further damage the environment. Why Charlton

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

Charlton was not chosen so much as the Carpenter Hill Substation was. The 345 kV and 115 kV transmission lines meet there, and it connects eastern and western Massachusetts. Because the project connects at an existing substation, it needs only a short line to the substation and no new long-distance transmission.

Each project is considered on its own merits, and cumulative burden is taken into account. The burden is high for this census block. A cumulative impact analysis is part of the state process and will become part of the public record. If the project is built, tree clearing outside the existing New England Power (National Grid) transmission right-of-way is committed at no more than 10 acres, on a 47-acre parcel.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Will it change the rural character, views, and quiet?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Why Charlton, and why this site?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Charlton already has solar, a power plant, gas storage. Why add this?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · September 10, 2026, 9:13 AM ETLand- You are taking from our landscape and the natural beauty so many people love and value about Carpenter Hill Road. What specific ways do you plan to give back to the neighborhood and ensure the nature landscape, the quiet, and the animals are impacted as little as possible? How do you intend to continue protecting the quiet, the land, and the animals beyond the completion of the facility?

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

The project will have visual and environmental impact. The design keeps battery equipment under 10 feet tall, sets it back from homes, and keeps existing trees for screening where possible. The nearest home is the landowner's, about 500 feet from the equipment area, which is well beyond the 200-foot minimum residential setback. Viewshed and acoustic studies are being completed and will inform the final design and mitigation. Erosion controls, stormwater management, and the limit of 10 acres of clearing outside the transmission right-of-way are committed, and construction traffic will be planned with the town.

After construction, protections for close neighbors, including screening, noise, night sky, and property value, and a structured post-construction review are Community Benefits Plan topics. They are under discussion and not promised yet. Tree replanting is a committed item, and the decommissioning bond covers removal and site restoration.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Will it change the rural character, views, and quiet?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · September 10, 2026, 8:30 AM ETI truly believe building the data center will make Charlton an unlivable place. It will cause air and light pollution, water waste, very unnecessary noise, everyone will be paying a higher tax for this and no one even wants it. The response I'm assuming a lot of people are getting when they says data center is it is not a data center but as other documents, people post from out of state where they build these things proves it starts off as an energy storage and becomes a data center. I personally think carpenter hill has beautiful view for seeing stars, sunsets, watching the fireworks from tree house, if this center gets built it's destroying all this beauty to Charlton. Charlton does not need an energy storage/data center facility.

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

Data center. No, this is not a data center. Carpenter Hill Power is a battery storage facility. It stores electricity from the grid and releases it when demand is high. It does not generate power or burn fuel. The only data processed is for monitoring and controlling the operation of the system.

Air, water, and noise. In normal operation the facility gives off no smoke or emissions. Water use details have not been published. The main sound in operation is a steady hum from the cooling units, inverters, and transformers, and the sound study is in progress.

Light and views. A lighting plan has not been published. Night sky, screening, and noise for close neighbors are Community Benefits Plan topics under discussion. The equipment is under 10 feet tall and set back from homes, and existing trees are kept for screening where possible. It is still industrial equipment on a rural parcel.

Taxes. The town is expected to receive standard property taxes or a payment in lieu of taxes negotiated with the town. Tax and assessment research is in progress, and no figures have been published.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • How much would Charlton receive?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • What substances could be released in a fire or failure?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Will the facility use local water or change the water table?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Will it change the rural character, views, and quiet?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • How loud will it be?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Is this a data center, or could it become one?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · June 3, 2026, 6:56 AM ETAs someone who just moved into my dream home in this very neighborhood, this project is nothing short of devastating to my family. We came to Charlton very specifically for its rural appeal. Projects like these slowly destroy the landscape and peacefulness of beautiful towns like Charlton.

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

The project is industrial equipment on a rural parcel. The design keeps clearing outside the transmission right-of-way to no more than 10 acres of a 47-acre parcel, keeps equipment under 10 feet tall and set back from homes, and keeps existing trees for screening where possible. Close-neighbor protections, including screening, noise, and night sky, are Community Benefits Plan topics under discussion. Comments on the draft plan are open into 2027.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Will it change the rural character, views, and quiet?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • What about wildlife and habitat?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · June 3, 2026, 8:00 PM ETWe live near Carpenter Hill and Do not want the battery storage near us

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

The comment is recorded in the engagement log. The project has not been approved, and the state's Energy Facilities Siting Board makes the final decision after public comment and hearings.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Is this going ahead whether we like it or not? How do we stop it?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Will it change the rural character, views, and quiet?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.