This history preserves the anonymized wording and earlier written responses in the imported project records. Earlier responses may describe a previous design or contain wording now under review. Use the linked consolidated question for the current response status.
A source record can contain several questions. These records are not a count of individual submissions or people. Original messages and dates are still being reconciled; this history does not establish that every project submission has been captured.
Showing 2 of 211 source records
Community Public Forum · September 30, 2026Can you prefer a domestic battery manufacturer?
No equipment decision on suppliers has been made, and details will be confirmed in the filing with the state.
How the issues were handled
A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.
One equipment maker, a U.S. supplier, testing the whole site? Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Community Public Forum · September 30, 2026Can the design require one equipment maker, identical replacement parts, and testing of the whole site?
These were specific asks from a Planning Board member, and they are on our list. Testing each unit to the fire standard is routine. We told the committee member that testing the whole site as a system is best practice and should be in the plan. Replacement parts and recalls are also tied to the equipment warranty, which gives the owner a reason to stay with the maker. None of this is a commitment yet.
How the issues were handled
A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.
One equipment maker, a U.S. supplier, testing the whole site? Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
