Question and Submission History

Original questions and earlier responses, linked to the consolidated answer bank.

Back to questions and answers

This history preserves the anonymized wording and earlier written responses in the imported project records. Earlier responses may describe a previous design or contain wording now under review. Use the linked consolidated question for the current response status.

A source record can contain several questions. These records are not a count of individual submissions or people. Original messages and dates are still being reconciled; this history does not establish that every project submission has been captured.

Showing 3 of 211 source records

Website and email · July 7, 2026, 8:32 AM ETToxic emissions, contamination of water, soil, air.

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

In normal operation nothing is burned, so the facility gives off no smoke or emissions. The batteries use lithium iron phosphate, which has no cobalt or nickel. The concern is a fire. Smoke from a battery fire can contain carbon monoxide and hydrogen fluoride. A gas plume analysis is committed and has not been published, so no road or home can be described as unaffected yet. The site is to have spill containment and stormwater management, firefighting water is to be captured on site, and a groundwater monitoring program is committed.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • What substances could be released in a fire or failure?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · August 4, 2026What substances could be released from damaged batteries, transformers, cooling equipment, or firefighting operations?

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

A damaged battery could vent hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and other hydrocarbons, along with smaller amounts of hydrogen fluoride and related fluorinated compounds from the electrolyte and binder. The facility's LFP chemistry does not contain cobalt or nickel, but that does not remove this risk, since it originates in a different part of the cell. A damaged transformer could release its dielectric oil, typically mineral or synthetic ester and not PCB-containing in modern equipment. Damaged cooling equipment could release glycol coolant or a fluorinated refrigerant. Firefighting operations mainly risk contaminated runoff carrying dissolved metals, fluoride, and soot particulates, which is why on-site containment and boundary drainage measures are already committed.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • What substances could be released in a fire or failure?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · September 10, 2026, 8:30 AM ETI truly believe building the data center will make Charlton an unlivable place. It will cause air and light pollution, water waste, very unnecessary noise, everyone will be paying a higher tax for this and no one even wants it. The response I'm assuming a lot of people are getting when they says data center is it is not a data center but as other documents, people post from out of state where they build these things proves it starts off as an energy storage and becomes a data center. I personally think carpenter hill has beautiful view for seeing stars, sunsets, watching the fireworks from tree house, if this center gets built it's destroying all this beauty to Charlton. Charlton does not need an energy storage/data center facility.

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

Data center. No, this is not a data center. Carpenter Hill Power is a battery storage facility. It stores electricity from the grid and releases it when demand is high. It does not generate power or burn fuel. The only data processed is for monitoring and controlling the operation of the system.

Air, water, and noise. In normal operation the facility gives off no smoke or emissions. Water use details have not been published. The main sound in operation is a steady hum from the cooling units, inverters, and transformers, and the sound study is in progress.

Light and views. A lighting plan has not been published. Night sky, screening, and noise for close neighbors are Community Benefits Plan topics under discussion. The equipment is under 10 feet tall and set back from homes, and existing trees are kept for screening where possible. It is still industrial equipment on a rural parcel.

Taxes. The town is expected to receive standard property taxes or a payment in lieu of taxes negotiated with the town. Tax and assessment research is in progress, and no figures have been published.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • How much would Charlton receive?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • What substances could be released in a fire or failure?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Will the facility use local water or change the water table?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Will it change the rural character, views, and quiet?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • How loud will it be?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Is this a data center, or could it become one?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.