Question and Submission History

Original questions and earlier responses, linked to the consolidated answer bank.

Back to questions and answers

This history preserves the anonymized wording and earlier written responses in the imported project records. Earlier responses may describe a previous design or contain wording now under review. Use the linked consolidated question for the current response status.

A source record can contain several questions. These records are not a count of individual submissions or people. Original messages and dates are still being reconciled; this history does not establish that every project submission has been captured.

Showing 7 of 211 source records

Public Community Meeting #1 · July 8, 2026What is the actual benefit to the town of Charlton?

Earlier published response

A Planning Board member mentioned an estimate of $30,000 annually in real estate taxes during the meeting. We still need to confirm this figure, along with what personal property taxes would contribute, and we will publish that analysis when our research is complete. Beyond direct tax payments, the Community Benefits Plan is where topics like fire safety equipment, conservation lands, local hiring preferences, and protections for neighbors get worked out between the town and the project.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • What does Charlton actually get?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Community Public Forum · September 30, 2026Beyond four hours of power, what does Charlton get?

Earlier published response

That is what the Community Benefits Plan is for. It is a draft with open decisions, and your comments can change it. Topics under discussion include payments to the town, fire equipment and training, senior center support, tree replanting, local hiring, and road bonding. The draft is at carpenterhillpower.com/benefits/plan, and comments are open into 2027.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • What does Charlton actually get?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · August 4, 2026If the answer is no, please state clearly what tangible benefit an ordinary Charlton resident will receive.

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

Tax or PILOT revenue to the town, and the Community Benefits Plan being built from priorities residents identified, including the senior center, conservation, recreation, education, and neighbor protections. The draft plan, released September 30, lists each benefit under discussion. It has 34 open decisions, and comments are open into 2027.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • What does Charlton actually get?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · August 4, 2026How will this project avoid repeating previous situations in which residents experienced the disruption while most of the financial benefit went elsewhere?

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

The plan is being drafted so that each funded item states its purpose, amount, recipient, and how it is enforced, and a public tracker shows whether the project delivers on it. Committee members have told us that specificity is what distinguished past promises that were kept from those that were not, and the plan is being drafted to that standard.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Will our feedback change anything?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • What does Charlton actually get?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Who makes sure the promises are kept?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · June 3, 2026, 6:29 AM ETI live on [street name removed] and I am against it in every way possible, it doesn't not benefit charlton in any real tangible way. I also believe it will hurt home values, the line research is emerging is a dead giveaway, the research will be done when its too late because we are the research.

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

Research on battery storage and property values is still emerging. Based on current data, properly screened and set-back facilities have shown negligible impact, but no Charlton data exists yet. The project has offered a property value study by a Massachusetts-licensed appraiser, comparing properties near comparable operating projects with similar properties farther away, published so residents can review the evidence. The draft Community Benefits Plan also proposes that if a home within 1,000 feet of the work limit sells for less than an independent appraisal says it is worth without the facility, the project pays the difference, up to a cap still to be set, for five years after the facility begins operating. This is a draft and not a promise. Benefits to Charlton are being shaped through the Community Benefits Plan, which has 34 open decisions.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • What does Charlton actually get?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Will property values go down?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · June 3, 2026, 4:39 PM ETI am opposed to the proposed Carpenter Hill Power battery storage project and believe the community deserves a much closer examination of both its impacts and its benefits.One of my primary concerns is the environmental impact of constructing and operating a large-scale battery storage facility in our town. While battery storage is often presented as a "green" technology, the project would still require significant site development, land disturbance, vegetation clearing, stormwater management, and long-term industrial infrastructure. Residents deserve a clear understanding of how the project will affect local ecosystems, wildlife habitats, water resources, and the surrounding landscape.I am also concerned that the benefits to our community appear limited while the impacts would be borne locally. The electricity generated or stored by the facility is not intended exclusively for our town, and it is unclear what direct advantages local residents will receive in exchange for hosting this industrial-scale project. The community would assume the visual impacts, potential safety concerns, construction disruptions, and changes to the character of the area, while the primary financial benefits flow elsewhere.Another concern is that the developers and investors behind the project are not necessarily the long-term stakeholders in our community. They do not have to live with the consequences of this project for decades to come. Residents, property owners, and future generations of town taxpayers will be the ones living alongside the facility long after the project is approved and built. For that reason, local voices should carry significant weight in this decision-making process.Before moving forward, I believe the town should require a thorough, independent review of the environmental, safety, economic, and community impacts of the project and demonstrate a clear, measurable benefit to local residents that outweighs the long-term costs and risks.

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

Environmental impact. The project requires site development, vegetation clearing, and stormwater management. Clearing outside the transmission right-of-way is limited to no more than 10 acres of a 47-acre parcel. Hydrology and stormwater studies, a sound study, a cumulative impact analysis, and a site suitability analysis are part of the state process and will be public. State reviewers have asked for a formal wetland delineation and a rare species information request.

Local benefits. The facility supports the regional grid, not only Charlton, and local benefits come through the Community Benefits Plan, which residents are shaping. Topics under discussion include payments to the town, fire equipment and training, senior center support, tree replanting, local hiring, and road bonding. The draft plan has 34 open decisions, and comments are open into 2027.

Long-term stakeholders and local voice. ESA expects to sell the project to a long-term owner. Permit conditions, the decommissioning bond, and the commitments in the public tracker are written to bind any future owner. Residents have a role in the Citizen Advisory Committee, at public meetings, in the comment period, and in the state's formal hearings.

Independent review. The Energy Facilities Siting Board conducts the state review, which includes public hearings and environmental review. An independent third-party review of the Emergency Action Plan is committed, selected by the town and paid for by the project.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Will anyone independent review it?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Has the combined effect of everything in the area been studied?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Will our feedback change anything?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • What does Charlton actually get?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • Will you contain all of the site's runoff, with a liner?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • What about wildlife and habitat?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • How do we know a new owner will keep the promises?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
Website and email · June 2, 2026, 9:26 PM ETWe do not want this in our town. It is terrible for the environment and will not bring any benefits to our town.

Earlier written draft (answers as of October 7, 2026)

The comment is recorded. Environmental protections and the benefits to Charlton are being shaped through the studies required by the state process and the Community Benefits Plan, and the draft plan is open for comment into 2027. The project has not been approved.

How the issues were handled

A written response is recorded. Sending an individual reply, considering feedback, and making a design change require separate evidence.

  • Is this going ahead whether we like it or not? How do we stop it?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • What does Charlton actually get?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.
  • What about wildlife and habitat?
    Individual reply: not confirmed. Consideration: not recorded. Design change: not confirmed.